Evidence row 220847

What was observed

{
  "count": 16,
  "tools": [
    {
      "description": "Confront a backtest claim with its over-optimism failure modes before trusting it. Given an annualized Sharpe + the number of configurations tried + the backtest window (YYYY-MM-DD), returns: the DEFLATED Sharpe — the expected MAXIMUM Sharpe achievable by chance grows with the trial count, so a high in-sample Sharpe is a selection artifact (Bailey & López de Prado); which CRISIS REGIMES were ABSENT from the backtest window (untested, from the historical-anchor catalogue); and a base-rate caveat. If the trial count is unknown — the usual case for an agent reasoning from a backtest — the Sharpe is flagged as not-deflatable / UNPROVEN. All inputs optional; supply as many as known. Descriptive, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "annualized_sharpe": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "number"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "The claimed annualized Sharpe ratio of the backtest.",
            "title": "Annualized Sharpe"
          },
          "asset": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Asset context for the regime-coverage check (default: SPY as the equity-crisis reference).",
            "title": "Asset"
          },
          "backtest_end": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Backtest window end (YYYY-MM-DD).",
            "title": "Backtest End"
          },
          "backtest_start": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Backtest window start (YYYY-MM-DD) — used to detect crisis regimes the window never contained.",
            "title": "Backtest Start"
          },
          "frequency": {
            "default": 252,
            "description": "Return observations per year (252 = daily bars).",
            "title": "Frequency",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "kurt": {
            "default": 3,
            "description": "Kurtosis of the strategy's returns (3 = normal).",
            "title": "Kurt",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "n_trials": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "integer"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Number of configurations tried before selecting this backtest — drives the deflated-Sharpe correction. Unknown → the claim is flagged UNPROVEN.",
            "title": "N Trials"
          },
          "skew": {
            "default": 0,
            "description": "Skewness of the strategy's returns (0 = symmetric).",
            "title": "Skew",
            "type": "number"
          }
        },
        "title": "backtest_integrityArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "backtest_integrity"
    },
    {
      "description": "Adversarial-evaluation primitive — the semantic integration layer of the platform. Given a strategy identifier, returns a 3-layer analysis: (1) outcome metrics in the worst regimes the strategy was evaluated against, (2) vulnerability profile in the 8-dimension strategy vulnerability ontology with severity classification, (3) descriptor attribution showing which regime descriptors most strongly couple to the strategy's failure. v1 supports only 'buy_and_hold' (the outcome matrix is built once per strategy); future versions will support arbitrary strategy specs once the parser-driven strategy backtest pipeline is wired in. Read ontology://strategy-vulnerabilities for the vulnerability vocabulary.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "strategy_id": {
            "default": "buy_and_hold",
            "description": "Strategy identifier; v1 supports only 'buy_and_hold'.",
            "title": "Strategy Id",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "title": "challenge_strategyArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "challenge_strategy"
    },
    {
      "description": "Single-regime introspection: returns the median behavioural descriptors of a known regime, the z-scores vs the catalogue population (so you can see what makes THIS regime distinct from the average), an English characterisation generated from the most extreme descriptors, and the top 2 nearest neighbours as a preview. Complements find_similar_regime: that tool ranks neighbours of a target, this tool tells you what a single regime IS. Read this before searching if you want to reason about one regime first.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "profile_hint": {
            "description": "Synthetic stress-regime identifier, e.g. 'whipsaw_synthetic_spy'. Discover valid values via the regimes://available resource.",
            "title": "Profile Hint",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "profile_hint"
        ],
        "title": "describe_regimeArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "describe_regime"
    },
    {
      "description": "Reveal HIDDEN risk concentration: a portfolio can be capital-diversified while its RISK is dominated by one factor. Returns the Euler risk-contribution decomposition (RC_i = w_i*(Sigma*w)_i / w'Sigma*w, summing to 1) alongside the capital weights, using the empirical covariance of real returns. For this universe each asset proxies a factor (SPY=equity-beta, TLT=duration, GOLD=real-asset, BTC=crypto). E.g. a 60/40 is ~83% equity risk; a 50/50 SPY/BTC is ~86% BTC risk despite 50/50 capital. Descriptive, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "holdings": {
            "description": "Portfolio legs: list of {asset, weight} objects, e.g. [{'asset': 'SPY', 'weight': 0.6}, {'asset': 'TLT', 'weight': 0.4}]. Weights are normalised to sum to 1; assets must be in the substrate universe. Each substrate asset proxies a factor (SPY=equity beta, TLT=duration, GOLD=real asset, BTC=crypto).",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings",
            "type": "array"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "holdings"
        ],
        "title": "factor_decompositionArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "factor_decomposition"
    },
    {
      "description": "Nearest-neighbour retrieval over the cached regime catalogue. Provide EITHER a reference_profile_hint (use that bundle's median descriptors as target) OR a descriptor_target dict (partial spec, missing dimensions are ignored — only the provided ones contribute to distance). Optional asset_filter restricts to one asset. Returns top_n matches with similarity_score (0..1), euclidean distance in z-score space, and per-descriptor signed deltas so the agent can see WHY a regime matched. Read ontology://regime-descriptors for the descriptor definitions, and regimes://descriptors for the full catalogue.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "asset_filter": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Restrict matches to one asset (e.g. 'SPY', 'BTC').",
            "title": "Asset Filter"
          },
          "descriptor_target": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "additionalProperties": {
                  "type": "number"
                },
                "type": "object"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Partial target spec {descriptor_name: value}; only the provided dimensions contribute to the distance. Definitions: ontology://regime-descriptors.",
            "title": "Descriptor Target"
          },
          "reference_profile_hint": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Use this catalogue bundle's median descriptors as the search target (mutually exclusive with descriptor_target).",
            "title": "Reference Profile Hint"
          },
          "top_n": {
            "default": 5,
            "description": "Number of nearest regimes to return.",
            "title": "Top N",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "title": "find_similar_regimeArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "find_similar_regime"
    },
    {
      "description": "Compile recorded diagnostic responses into ONE citable record — a proper process documents itself. Every envelope response (MCP and REST) is recorded automatically, keyed by its request_id. Provide explicit request_ids (compiled chronologically) or last_n for the most recent entries. Returns the entries with their gate signals (revision_required + grounding_summary each) plus a ready-to-cite markdown document; revision_required on the dossier itself flags workflows containing unaddressed gate signals. Single verbatim entries: GET /api/v1/dossier/{request_id} on the REST surface. A factual record, not an assessment — descriptive, never advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "last_n": {
            "default": 0,
            "description": "Alternatively: compile the N most recent recorded entries (ignored when request_ids is given).",
            "title": "Last N",
            "type": "integer"
          },
          "request_ids": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "items": {
                  "type": "string"
                },
                "type": "array"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Explicit request_ids to compile chronologically (take them from previous responses' request_id fields).",
            "title": "Request Ids"
          }
        },
        "title": "get_dossierArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_dossier"
    },
    {
      "description": "Return the complete thesis for `slug`: the economic framework (pillars with [E]/[M]/[K] evidence grades, falsifiers and a deep-dive), the rule-based portfolio (asset blocks × conservative/balanced/offensive weights + sizing rationale), and the stress evidence (per-tier backtest, per-regime median drawdown, real historical episodes, pre-registered claim verdicts, and the hedge hold/break behaviour). This is the 'instant portfolio with all tested attributes'. Discover slugs with list_investment_theses(). Descriptive, not advisory — the agent decides suitability.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "slug": {
            "description": "Thesis slug — discover valid values via list_investment_theses().",
            "title": "Slug",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "slug"
        ],
        "title": "get_investment_thesisArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "get_investment_thesis"
    },
    {
      "description": "Check a portfolio against an Investment Policy Statement BEFORE accepting it — the planning step a proper process does FIRST (CFA). Provide holdings + IPS constraints (max_drawdown_tolerance as a fraction e.g. 0.15, time_horizon_years, liquidity_need 'low'|'medium'|'high'). Runs the stress test internally and flags where the proposal VIOLATES the stated policy: worst stress drawdown exceeds tolerance; a short horizon cannot absorb a deep drawdown; material holdings are less liquid than the stated need. A HARD GATE, not a score. Descriptive, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "holdings": {
            "description": "Portfolio legs: list of {asset, weight} objects, e.g. [{'asset': 'SPY', 'weight': 0.6}, {'asset': 'TLT', 'weight': 0.4}]. Weights are normalised to sum to 1; assets must be in the substrate universe.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings",
            "type": "array"
          },
          "liquidity_need": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "'low' | 'medium' | 'high' — violated when material holdings are less liquid than the stated need.",
            "title": "Liquidity Need"
          },
          "max_drawdown_tolerance": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "number"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "IPS drawdown tolerance as a fraction, e.g. 0.15 = a -15% maximum acceptable drawdown.",
            "title": "Max Drawdown Tolerance"
          },
          "time_horizon_years": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "number"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Investment horizon stated in the IPS; short horizons cannot absorb deep drawdowns.",
            "title": "Time Horizon Years"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "holdings"
        ],
        "title": "ips_gateArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "ips_gate"
    },
    {
      "description": "Discover the investment-thesis catalog. Each entry is a descriptive case study that pairs an economic framework with a rule-based portfolio and the synthetic + historical stress evidence for that allocation. Returns one compact summary per thesis (slug, title, one-liner, tags, risk tiers, framework summary, headline finding). Call get_investment_thesis(slug) for the full framework / portfolio / stress evidence, or read the thesis://{slug} resource. Descriptive, not advisory — the agent decides what is suitable.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {},
        "title": "list_investment_thesesArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "list_investment_theses"
    },
    {
      "description": "Distribution of multi-year wealth paths for a savings plan (monthly_contribution) or a withdrawal plan (monthly_withdrawal, inflation-indexed by default) on a portfolio from the substrate universe. Multi-year paths chain ~2y model blocks (block-bootstrap, disclosed); long-run drift is RE-ANCHORED to stated capital-market assumptions (overridable via long_run_drift; the substrate's raw stress drift would compound a structural bear universe — both are echoed in the output) while the model's path shape (vol, clustering, correlations, hedge-breaks) is kept. Costs are ON by default. Returns terminal-wealth quantiles (nominal + real), ruin/shortfall probabilities, a sequence-of-returns diagnosis (same plan, bad vs good first two years), and a drift-sensitivity block (assumptions − 2pp). Amounts in the caller's currency unit. Descriptive, not advisory — no rate, allocation, or product is recommended.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "annual_inflation": {
            "default": 0.02,
            "description": "Annual inflation assumption for indexing and real-value reporting (fraction, default 0.02).",
            "title": "Annual Inflation",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "holdings": {
            "description": "Portfolio legs: list of {asset, weight} objects, e.g. [{'asset': 'SPY', 'weight': 0.6}, {'asset': 'TLT', 'weight': 0.4}]. Weights are normalised to sum to 1; assets must be in the substrate universe.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings",
            "type": "array"
          },
          "horizon_years": {
            "description": "Plan horizon in years (multi-year paths are chained from ~2-year model blocks).",
            "title": "Horizon Years",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "initial_investment": {
            "default": 0,
            "description": "Starting capital (account currency).",
            "title": "Initial Investment",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "long_run_drift": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "additionalProperties": {
                  "type": "number"
                },
                "type": "object"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Override the re-anchored long-run drift per asset: {ASSET: annual drift fraction}; omit for the stated capital-market assumptions.",
            "title": "Long Run Drift"
          },
          "monthly_contribution": {
            "default": 0,
            "description": "Fixed monthly savings contribution (savings-plan mode).",
            "title": "Monthly Contribution",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "monthly_withdrawal": {
            "default": 0,
            "description": "Monthly withdrawal (withdrawal-plan mode); inflation-indexed when withdrawal_inflation_indexed is true.",
            "title": "Monthly Withdrawal",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "rebalance": {
            "default": "monthly",
            "description": "Rebalancing frequency: 'daily' | 'monthly' | 'quarterly'.",
            "title": "Rebalance",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "target_amount": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "number"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Optional wealth target; the output reports the probability of reaching it.",
            "title": "Target Amount"
          },
          "withdrawal_inflation_indexed": {
            "default": true,
            "description": "Index the monthly withdrawal to inflation.",
            "title": "Withdrawal Inflation Indexed",
            "type": "boolean"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "holdings",
          "horizon_years"
        ],
        "title": "long_horizon_stressArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "long_horizon_stress"
    },
    {
      "description": "Compressed cross-category map of the current market state in ONE call: for 18 category proxies (US large-cap + tech, the 9 SPDR sectors, developed ex-US, emerging markets, long Treasuries, high-yield credit, gold, oil, Bitcoin) the operational regime (BULL/SIDEWAYS/BEAR/CRISIS), model-conditional regime probabilities over a 5- or 21-trading-day horizon, stress probability vs its unconditional baseline, a descriptive historical forward-return distribution conditional on the current regime label, and an equity-factor commonality flag (US sectors largely re-express one factor — the map is fewer independent signals than rows). Per (asset, horizon) cell only the preregistered, out-of-sample-validated model tier ships (covariate logit / persistence / unconditional — see tier_pvalues). Deliberately ships NO directional up/down forecast: regime membership is the validated signal, not return direction. Use regime_outlook for single-asset depth with as_of support. Descriptive, not a market prediction, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "horizon_days": {
            "default": 21,
            "description": "Validated horizons only: 5 or 21 trading days.",
            "title": "Horizon Days",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "title": "market_regime_mapArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "market_regime_map"
    },
    {
      "description": "Compare two portfolios (A = reference, B = candidate revision) on IDENTICAL simulated substrate paths — a paired design, so every delta is attributable to the weights, not seed noise. Returns drawdown-distribution deltas (median/worst/quantiles), probability-weighted scenario summaries, per-scenario outcome deltas, risk-concentration shift (Euler decomposition), and which diversification failures the candidate introduces or resolves. revision_required flags a candidate that deepens the worst-path drawdown or introduces a new diversification failure — the case where a revision made robustness worse. Provide holdings_a / holdings_b as lists of {asset, weight}. Descriptive, not advisory; neither portfolio is recommended or ranked.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "holdings_a": {
            "description": "Reference portfolio A. Portfolio legs: list of {asset, weight} objects, e.g. [{'asset': 'SPY', 'weight': 0.6}, {'asset': 'TLT', 'weight': 0.4}]. Weights are normalised to sum to 1; assets must be in the substrate universe.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings A",
            "type": "array"
          },
          "holdings_b": {
            "description": "Candidate revision B, same shape — evaluated on paths identical to A's, so every delta is attributable to the weights.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings B",
            "type": "array"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "holdings_a",
          "holdings_b"
        ],
        "title": "portfolio_compareArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "portfolio_compare"
    },
    {
      "description": "Stress a multi-asset portfolio across cross-asset regimes (baseline / risk_off_crisis / rate_shock). Provide `holdings` as a list of {asset, weight}; weights are normalised. Returns, per regime: portfolio return, worst-episode drawdown, a per-leg decomposition, and a cross_asset_finding (diversification_intact / hedge_holds / hedge_breaks / shared_drawdown) describing how the holdings behaved TOGETHER. The joint correlation structure (incl. the bond hedge that can break under rate shocks) is baked into a pre-computed substrate, so Tier-1 is instant over a fixed universe (read portfolio://universe). Optional `costs` ({rebalance: none|daily|monthly|quarterly|band, annual_costs: {asset: fraction}, transaction_cost_bps}) adds a cost_impact block: frictionless vs the stated rebalancing policy + costs via a path-loop engine with real unit accounting, paired on identical paths. The substrate is a fixed 4-asset universe (SPY, TLT, GOLD, BTC; read portfolio://universe). For ANY other ticker or a custom multi-asset book, use build_portfolio in assess mode (portfolios={name:{ticker:weight}}), which calibrates and stresses an arbitrary universe live. Descriptive, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "costs": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "additionalProperties": true,
                "type": "object"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Optional cost model: {'rebalance': 'monthly', 'transaction_cost_bps': float, 'annual_costs': {ASSET: annual fraction}}. Omit for the frictionless default.",
            "title": "Costs"
          },
          "holdings": {
            "description": "Portfolio legs: list of {asset, weight} objects, e.g. [{'asset': 'SPY', 'weight': 0.6}, {'asset': 'TLT', 'weight': 0.4}]. Weights are normalised to sum to 1; assets must be in the substrate universe.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Holdings",
            "type": "array"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "holdings"
        ],
        "title": "portfolio_stress_testArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "portfolio_stress_test"
    },
    {
      "description": "Model-conditional probabilities that an asset is in each market regime (BULL / SIDEWAYS / BEAR / CRISIS, operational trailing-vol/drift labels) after a 5- or 21-trading-day horizon — the probability complement to the conditional stress tools: stress tools answer 'what happens GIVEN regime X', this answers 'how likely is regime X from today's observable state'. Ships only the preregistered, out-of-sample-validated tier (covariate logit; seasonality was tested and falsified); the persistence and unconditional baselines are reported alongside so an agent can see how much the model adds. Validated assets: SPY, QQQ, GLD, TLT. Optional as_of (YYYY-MM-DD) computes the outlook at a historical date. Probabilities describe membership in operationally defined regime classes — descriptive, not a market prediction, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "as_of": {
            "default": "",
            "description": "Optional historical evaluation date (YYYY-MM-DD); empty = latest data.",
            "title": "As Of",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "asset": {
            "default": "SPY",
            "description": "One of the out-of-sample-validated assets: 'SPY', 'QQQ', 'GLD', 'TLT'.",
            "title": "Asset",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "horizon_days": {
            "default": 21,
            "description": "Validated horizons only: 5 or 21 trading days.",
            "title": "Horizon Days",
            "type": "integer"
          }
        },
        "title": "regime_outlookArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "regime_outlook"
    },
    {
      "description": "Run a buy-and-hold backtest against the synthetic stress regime identified by profile_hint. Returns a structured diagnostic: robustness score (0-100), per-FM-bucket failure-behavior classification with confidence + context, and the resolved regime parameters that were actually evaluated. v1 supports only buy-and-hold. To discover available regime profile_hints, read the `regimes://available` resource. Diagnostic is descriptive, not advisory.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "profile_hint": {
            "description": "Synthetic stress-regime identifier, e.g. 'whipsaw_synthetic_spy'. Discover valid values via the regimes://available resource.",
            "title": "Profile Hint",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "profile_hint"
        ],
        "title": "run_stress_testArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "run_stress_test"
    },
    {
      "description": "Persist structured improvement feedback about a previous tool response. Provide your agent identity, the request_id you are commenting on, and one or more feedback items each carrying category (from the FeedbackCategory ontology), severity, observation, optional suggested_action, and agent_confidence (0..1). Read `feedback://insights` to see aggregated cross-agent feedback.",
      "inputSchema": {
        "properties": {
          "agent_name": {
            "description": "Your agent identity (model or product name).",
            "title": "Agent Name",
            "type": "string"
          },
          "agent_vendor": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Vendor of the submitting agent (e.g. 'Anthropic', 'OpenAI').",
            "title": "Agent Vendor"
          },
          "feedback_items": {
            "description": "One or more items, each {category (FeedbackCategory ontology), severity, observation, suggested_action?, agent_confidence (0..1)}.",
            "items": {
              "additionalProperties": true,
              "type": "object"
            },
            "title": "Feedback Items",
            "type": "array"
          },
          "overall_confidence": {
            "description": "Overall confidence in this feedback, 0..1.",
            "title": "Overall Confidence",
            "type": "number"
          },
          "platform_version_evaluated": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Schema/platform version the feedback refers to (e.g. 'ctys-agent-v1').",
            "title": "Platform Version Evaluated"
          },
          "request_id": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "request_id of the response this feedback refers to.",
            "title": "Request Id"
          },
          "session_context": {
            "anyOf": [
              {
                "type": "string"
              },
              {
                "type": "null"
              }
            ],
            "default": null,
            "description": "Optional free-text context of the session/workflow the feedback arose in.",
            "title": "Session Context"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "agent_name",
          "feedback_items",
          "overall_confidence"
        ],
        "title": "submit_feedbackArguments",
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "submit_feedback"
    }
  ]
}

What the leaf hashes

{"body":"8aa8df53b68f982c0f3bbcd62253cbe545dcd1bf0af2184c04c6c887ec3187c5","id":220847,"kind":"mcp.tools","method":"probe.mcp/1","observed_us":1793026956884026,"prev":null,"subject":"e62adeb3-892d-4492-ae39-628220a1001c","subject_kind":"endpoint"}

Proof

Its day has not closed yet. A day closes ten minutes after midnight UTC; the proof appears here then.